The Exhibit Cost Record

The Exhibit Cost Record

The public record of what museum exhibits, interactives, and AV actually cost.

The record of what exhibits and interactive media cost already exists in public — federal contracts, grants, state procurement portals, UK tenders, and nonprofit tax filings. It has just never been assembled in one place. No firm's internal finances appear here; every row traces to a source you can check yourself.

1,629total records
5public sources
1,237federal contract awards
218NSF / IMLS grants
107state contracts
58990 contractor disclosures

Browse

Browse the dataSearch and filter all 1,629 records, with a source link on every row.
FindingsWhat the data indicates about exhibit pricing, computed directly from the data.
MethodologySources, classification rules, the scope-normalization standard, QA results.
Published benchmarksIndustry cost figures from named public sources (MGAC, Praxis Exhibits).

Five public sources, one comparable record

Every transaction type discloses cost differently. This dataset normalizes them into one schema — recipient, client, year, amount, description, and a consistent project-scope classification — while keeping each row's own source distinct and citable.

Federal contractsUSAspending.gov awards for exhibit design, fabrication, AV integration, and interpretive media — Smithsonian, NPS, and other federal agencies, 2015–present.
Federal grantsNSF's Advancing Informal STEM Learning program and IMLS museum-grant programs — the science-center and small-museum slice federal contracts miss.
State contractsOpen-checkbook and contract-transparency portals in Texas, California, New York, and Washington.
UK tendersPublic tenders from UK national museums, kept as non-US comparables and never mixed into US figures.
IRS Form 990 disclosuresEvery nonprofit museum must disclose its five highest-paid independent contractors over $100K — the only source that captures nonprofit museum spending directly.

The scope-normalization standard

Published exhibit-cost figures vary mostly by what's bundled into the number — not by the underlying market. The canonical unit of comparison across every row is the full interactive scope, hardware and software combined — design, software, content, hardware, and integration — excluding exhibit fabrication and base-building infrastructure. Awards that deviate are flagged (fabrication_inclusive) rather than silently mixed in. Read the full standard on the methodology page.

About the data

Every row traces to a public, independently checkable source — a government procurement record, a grant database, or a nonprofit's own IRS filing. This is a descriptive record, not price advice, and makes no commentary on any firm's pricing. Data is licensed CC BY 4.0. See the About page for the full rules of the road.